With reference to Mughal India, what is/are the difference/ differences between Jagirdar and Zamindar?
- 1.Jagirdars were holders of land assignments in lieu of judicial and police duties, whereas Zamindars were holders of revenue rights without obligation to perform any duty other than revenue collection.
- 2.Land assignments to Jagirdars were hereditary and the revenue rights of Zamindars were not hereditary.
- A.1 only
- B.2 only
- C.Both 1 and 2
- D.Neither 1 nor 2
▶ Answer & Explanation
Correct answer: D. Neither 1 nor 2
Jagirdars were officials who were granted the right to collect revenue from a specific territory (a jagir) for a temporary period, usually in lieu of salary and for maintaining troops. This assignment was not hereditary. Zamindars, on the other hand, were hereditary proprietors of land, possessing traditional rights over land within their territories, and were responsible for paying revenue to the state, often collecting it from the cultivators. While they did have certain duties, their primary distinction from jagirdars lay in their hereditary status and ownership rights over land, which the jagirdars lacked.
Source: UPSC gs1 2019